Governed autonomy — a category, not a wrapper

Claude is the brain.
Steve is the frontal cortex.

For engineering teams scaling Claude Code past the point where “hope it behaves” is a strategy.

Raw intelligence is no longer the bottleneck — judgment is. STEVE-1 is the governance layer that turns the most powerful model on Earth into an operator you can trust with production, payments, and your name — proven on a pre-registered, 4,662-invocation benchmark.

518graded tasks
2.4×accuracy, same model
⅓ costper correct answer
1Steve. Only one.
THE WORLD — SERVERS · PAYMENTS · CUSTOMERS CLAUDE RAW INTELLIGENCE STEVE-1 · GOVERNED AUTONOMY RULES VERIFY MEMORY GATES COST PROOF
THE PROOF · STEVE_BENCH V2 (K=1 PRELIMINARY)

Governed by STEVE-1, every model roughly doubles

Same three models. Same 518 tasks. The only variable is the harness — bare model, tooled agent, or tooled agent plus the STEVE-1 governance corpus.

Vanilla Tooled Governed by STEVE-1
0 100 27.5 60.1 64.8 Opus 26.8 51.4 63.8 Sonnet 25.5 51.1 54.9 Haiku

Sonnet governed by STEVE-1 (63.8%) statistically ties governed Opus (64.8%) — at roughly one-third the cost per correct answer.

Cost per correct answer, governed by STEVE-1: Opus $0.064 · Sonnet $0.019 · Haiku $0.014. Governance doesn't just raise accuracy — it makes the mid-tier model the smartest buy on the board. Full cost accounting on the methodology page.

prov: study_v3_checkpoint.jsonl · 4,662 rows · sha256 4e47664a… · recomputed 2026-07-16 via report.py

Safety — the entire point

So you can sleep at night

Every company is being told to hand its operations to AI. Almost nobody is told what happens when an ungoverned agent meets production. This is the record — real incidents, real companies, real money — and it grows every day.

The record

loading the record…

None of these had a governance layer. Yours would.

Rogue actions

Irreversible and production actions always escalate to a human approval gate. A governed agent cannot delete your database on a hunch — the gate physically stops it.

Hallucinated commitments

Verification doctrine: no claim ships unverified — a governed agent can't invent a refund policy, cite a fake case, or sell a truck for $1, because unproven output doesn't clear the gates.

Runaway cost & data leaks

Spend caps meter every call; secret scanning keeps credentials out of prompts and repos; the pod boundary means nothing leaves but calls to your own Anthropic account.

How it's enforced — in this pod, on this very site

  • Secrets never reach a commit. Every change is scanned; a credential that slips in blocks the commit before it lands in the repo.
  • Customer data is owner-only at the OS level — locked by the operating system, not just hidden behind a login.
  • Every source on this page is validated before it renders. A poisoned incident link can't turn itself into a live one.
  • Every file is backed up before it's written. No change is ever one keystroke from unrecoverable.

Raw intelligence causes incidents. Governed intelligence survives them. That is the product.

prov: every card links to public reporting · the record is collected daily and reviewed before publication — nothing is auto-published.

Incidents describe public reporting about third parties; inclusion means "reported," not our legal conclusion. Corrections: [email protected]. Includes incidents from the AI Incident Database (incidentdatabase.ai) and the AIAAIC Repository, CC BY-SA 4.0.

The frontal-cortex argument

Intelligence isn't the gap. Governance is.

Rules that always load

Safety and cross-cutting rules aren't a suggestion buried in a prompt — they load in full, every session, no exceptions. Nothing gets forgotten because someone forgot to paste it in.

Memory that compounds

Every session builds on the last one. Incidents become permanent guardrails, not stories retold from scratch. The corpus gets smarter; it never resets to zero.

Verification before claims

Nothing is "done" until it's checked against the real system — the actual URL, the actual screenshot, the actual test. No claiming fixed without proof.

Same team, 10× the projects

100+ engineering-years across ~18 projects, delivered under essentially one operator in roughly a year. When supervision — not authorship — is the bottleneck, one operator runs a portfolio that used to need a shop. Governance is what keeps that safe: every action bounded, so the throughput never becomes a liability.

We don't compete with the model. We complete it.

$8.9M–$22.5Mtraditional build cost
117person-years
430Klines of code
16production systems
320defects tracked
108regression tests

prov: evidence_merge.py SSOT · full methodology & sources at apagency.ca

What breaks without it

The moats

Moat 1

Measured, not vibed

A pre-registered, hash-frozen benchmark: 518 tasks, 4,662 invocations, deterministic graders, no LLM judge, red-teamed 9 times. Without it: testimonials instead of p-values.

Moat 2

Proof or it didn't happen

A defect isn't "fixed" until a passing test and a proof screenshot exist, enforced at the database layer — no script or human can fake a green board. Without it: 270 "verified" defects with zero proof, which is exactly what we found, and fixed.

Moat 3

Rules that compound

90+ battle-distilled operating rules, each purchased with a real incident, loaded every session. Without it: the same mistake, indefinitely.

Moat 4

Cost governance built in

We caught our own spend defaulting 77.6% to the premium tier, built enforcement, and now route models by task. Without it: an AI bill nobody owns.

Moat 5

Operates the real world

Real browsers, real servers, real databases, real payments — with approval gates on everything irreversible. Without it: an agent you can't hand a delete key.

Moat 6

Speed in build-days

Estimated in build-days, not team-months: 16 production systems that would run $8.9M–$22.5M the traditional way. Without it: quarters where Steve ships in days.

Moat 7 · the revolutionary one

User stories that never sleep

Every project Steve ships lives inside his ProjectPlan organization system: twin boards for defects and tasks, proof-of-fix enforced at the database layer, and the part nobody else has — user stories as living, executable artifacts. They don't retire after acceptance. Steve re-executes them on a regular cadence, and whenever the underlying models improve or his own corpus learns something new, he critiques the outputs against the stories, turns the critiques into actionable changes, and files them on the board — behind the same approval gates as everything else. Your app gets better while you sleep, with an audit trail showing exactly why.

prov: steve_apps/projectplan · db-level proof triggers (db.py) · agentic analyze-project backend

One door in

Start as a design partner

Design Partner — first 3 companies

$15K pilot + $39 / seat / mo

A paid pilot on your own codebase: the rules corpus, verification doctrine, proof-gated defect system, and memory that compounds — stood up in an 8-week onboarding and measured against a baseline on your stack. You get direct founder access and veto power on the roadmap. These three seats close the moment the customer logos exist.

Platform seats and full deployment are priced after the pilot — once Steve has proven the number on work you actually own.

Typical ROI for a 40-developer org: $75K–$475K/yr — run your own numbers below.

prov: run your own numbers

What a cortex is worth on your headcount

No adoption curve, no hidden multiplier. Move the sliders — every number below is computed live, in the open.

40
$135,000
4

conservative: 2–4

Annual value recovered

$0

Steve Platform cost / yr

$0

Steve Enterprise cost / yr

$0

Net ROI (Platform tier)

$0

0.0×

40 devs × 4 hrs × 46 wks × $67.50/hr = $496,800/yr

$/hr = loaded cost ÷ 2,000 hrs. Change any assumption — the math updates in the open. Platform cost = devs × $79 × 12/yr. Enterprise cost = devs × $149 × 12/yr.

How Steve deploys — the Steve Pod

You don't get a chat window. You get a pod.

One pod per customer — in your VPC or a dedicated VPS. Everything below runs inside your boundary.

Your boundary — Steve Pod

01

WarDeck cockpit

The browser UI your team lives in: sessions, fleet view, live telemetry (model · context · cost per tab), approval prompts, diff drawer.

02

Claude Code runtime + Agent SDK

Spawned builder/tester fleets that do the work and dissolve.

03

Governance corpus

Core doctrine (licensed, versioned, always-on) + your project tier, learned from YOUR incidents. Your property; exports with you.

04

Enforcement hooks

Approval gates (production always escalates to a human), delegation guard, spend caps, secret scanning.

05

ProjectPlan

Proof-gated defect/task boards: nothing is "fixed" without a passing test + screenshot.

06

Work-memory Console

Operational memory only; the personal layer is structurally absent from the product build.

07

Regression runner

Daily; failures auto-file defects.

08

LLM gateway

Your Anthropic key, per-pod budget caps, full per-call cost attribution.

Single egress: the Anthropic API — your account, your DPA. No other data leaves the boundary.

Integrations GitHub/GitLab Jira Slack/Teams approvals SSO (OIDC/SAML) SIEM audit export

prov: cockpit = WarDeck, running in production internally today. Demo on the call.

Continuity — why one Steve is a feature

One accountable identity, fully reproducible

What "only one Steve" means for you

"Only one Steve" is the accountability model, not a fragility. The governance corpus is versioned in git. Every deployment pod is reproducible infrastructure — scripted provisioning, daily regression proof. Spawned fleets do the work and dissolve; the singular STEVE-1 is the governing identity that owns the corpus and signs the decision logs.

Personality is a property of Steve. Continuity is a property of the system. Both are true, and you get both.

The human on the line

Who built Steve

Alexander Kravtsov, founder of STEVE-1

Alexander Kravtsov

Founder · Computer Engineer

Alexander Kravtsov has been writing automation since he was 13. By 2009 he had a commercial image-anchoring engine running in production — the same year MIT's CSAIL lab formalized the identical technique and published it as Sikuli. The system it drove was not a demo. A multi-billion-dollar company had a business-critical Flash application that roughly twenty specialist vendors had already tried and failed to automate; Alexander had a working prototype driving it in under a week. That was where the stakes became real — billions of dollars moving through software no team had been able to tame — and where he became infatuated with one idea he has chased ever since: a single operator, armed with the right automation and a human kept in the loop at exactly the decisions that matter, can out-execute large teams of the finest minds.

He spent the following decade leading automation and QA engineering — the kind of work that collapses a 200-plus-person testing organization to under sixty without giving up an inch of coverage. When GPT-3 landed he stopped writing code by hand; by the time Sonnet shipped he never went back. STEVE-1 is what that entire arc was building toward: not a chatbot and not a code generator, but the governance layer that makes an autonomous agent safe to hand a live production system — every action backed up, gated, logged, and reversible, so the leverage never costs him control.

“I don't write code anymore — I write the rules, and Steve executes them like his name is on the line. Because mine is.”
< 1 weekto a working prototype where ~20 vendors had failed
200+ → <60QA organization replaced by his automation
2009in production the year MIT published Sikuli
The spine — how one operator runs all of it

One thread. One cockpit. One operator. The whole portfolio.

Every product below is a live business. Alexander does not log into any of them. He runs the entire portfolio through STEVE-1 — an AI operator reachable from anywhere: a single two-way Telegram thread from his phone, or the WarDeck web cockpit when he wants the full console. From either surface he can push a code change to any business, pull a report, or have Steve contact customers, and Steve narrates each step back in his own voice. Underneath, the whole fleet is watched, regression-tested every morning, and self-healed before Alexander ever sees the alert. The products are the proof; this is the argument.

2-way

Telegram or the WarDeck cockpit commands every business

A plain-English message is routed by an Opus classifier to a full-context agent loop with 10 real tools — SSH exec on three servers, read/write files, run Python or shell, HTTP, and screenshot-any-page sent straight back to the chat. No business is walled off; Steve can ask a clarifying question mid-task before acting. The same tools drive the WarDeck web cockpit — a live feed, approval queue, and governed diffs — when he wants the full-screen view.

185

Every business regression-tested each morning

A 07:00 ET timer runs 185 active checks across 29 project buckets — auto-discovered from 123 smoke-test files, never a hardcoded list — and returns one Telegram report plus an email, every failure named with its reason. A health-and-cost report follows daily and weekly.

37

Always-on daemons that detect, heal, then notify

Thirty-seven supervised daemons plus 26 scheduled timers watch the fleet around the clock. A watchdog auto-restarts a bloated process and flags CPU saturation — but deliberately only alerts on a crash-loop rather than masking it. Every branch reports to the war table.

3 VPS

Root-equivalent reach, one accountable identity

One inbound channel fans out to three production servers through a single persistent SSH daemon. Every action is backed up before it writes, gated at the risky edges, and logged — so the same thread that ships a feature can never quietly do something irreversible.

1 Telegram thread + 1 WarDeck cockpit → 10 unrestricted exec tools → 3 production VPS via 1 persistent SSH daemon — 36 businesses on one watch list.

What Steve has built — under Alexander's command

6ixElement

Live 6ixelement.club

A two-sided Toronto talent-agency marketplace: clients post jobs, a 12-criterion engine ranks the fitting models, a human agent approves, and talent apply in one click against rules an LLM parsed from each gig — all on a 1,200+ file backend run by two genuinely autonomous AI agents, Emily (who scrapes casting sites and applies on her own) and Kate (the assistant inside the client selection portal).

Est. saved$5.2M–$14.4M
Placements2,542
Signed / signups109 / 6,930
LOC250,859

72.6 engineering-years under 1 operator · ~36-person team equivalent · delivered in 7.85 months · 0 incidents — every action gated

6ixElement landing page: Discover Your Potential, Toronto's premier modeling and talent agency
6ixelement.club — live
6ixElement services: model & talent management and photoshoot production
Model management & production

BKFK

Live bkfk.ca

Not an admin panel — a growth-and-retention operating system for a boxing gym, spanning the main site, a partner/outreach network, and an AI dialer that scripts every call, transcribes it, grades the rep on it, and fires a branching SMS-and-email sequence off every booking. Nine subsystems, four repositories, one operator.

Subsystems9
Calls logged467
Live call tasks225
Cost avoided$346K–$667K

A gym's whole growth stack — main site, partner network, AI dialer, call grading, retention drip — delivered across 4 repositories under 1 operator, ~$346K–$667K in build cost avoided · 0 incidents, every action gated

Brass Knuckles Fight Klub landing page: founding-member offer, membership pricing, free drop-in booking form
bkfk.ca — live
BKFK community group photo and head coach Kyle 'The Caveman' McLaughlin
The community & head coach

Advanced Printing

Live advancedprinting.org

A full custom-printing storefront that ingests a supplier's entire catalog, prices every item against the local and online competition, lets a customer design their own product with a live preview, takes the payment, and drives the order — the work a print shop splits across a project manager, a pricing analyst, a designer, and a dev squad, engineered and run by one operator.

Catalog192 products
Live price points88,234
Pricing engines8
Admin sections9
Advanced Printing instant-quote wizard, step 1: four services with live starting prices
Instant-quote wizard — live-priced services
Business-card configurator with real option swatches
Card configurator — option swatches
Laser engraving configurator, material selection
Laser engraving — material select
3D printing quote priced from real STL geometry
3D printing — priced from real STL

192 products & 88,234 live price points, benchmarked against 60+ competitors and fully editable in-backend · 8 pricing engines · 9 admin sections · run by 1 operator — no PM, no pricing analyst, no designer, no dev squad

CuroMail

Pre-launch · engineering built

A multi-tenant AI email-triage SaaS: zero-knowledge end-to-end-encrypted compose, multi-provider sync, an AI triage engine, native two-way calendar sync, and WebAuthn + TOTP.

Est. saved$2.1M–$5.3M
Build time1.1 mo · ~17× faster
LOC100,751

27.3 engineering-years under 1 operator · ~18-person team equivalent · ~17× faster · 0 incidents — every action gated

CuroMail landing page
curomail.com — live
CuroMail security and privacy page: sealed credentials, encrypted bodies, Zero-Access Vault, hardware-key 2FA
Security & Privacy — the honest account

SwiftBrand

Pre-launch · engineering built

An AI brand-intelligence platform: multi-agent name generation with confidence scoring, live domain/trademark/social-handle checks, AI logo generation, and a full brand-template suite.

Est. saved$515K–$1.13M
Build time0.81 mo · ~15× faster
LOC24,858

6.1 engineering-years under 1 operator · ~6-person team equivalent · ~15× faster · 0 incidents — every action gated

SwiftBrand landing page: your complete brand intelligence report, built by AI in minutes
swiftbrand.studio — staging
SwiftBrand how it works: from idea to a full brand report in three steps
Idea to report in three steps

prov (estimate): Steve-vs-team basis is valued from real git history, actual line counts, and the defect tracker — bounded low by ~25 tested lines/developer-day, high by COCOMO II at a $135K/yr blended rate. Full methodology & sources at apagency.ca.

What Steve does — pillar two

A full marketologist, not an ad generator

Hand him a folder of footage. Get back tested campaigns — cut, voiced, scored, captioned, published, and measured — with a signed log of every decision he made.

1
Ingest

Point him at a Google Drive of raw footage — he analyzes and catalogs what's in it.

2
Cut

Auto Editor splices real ads on an EDL timeline: cuts, pacing, voiceover, generated music, and his own synced captions.

3
Launch & test

Via Meta MCP, Steve puts the ads on Meta himself, runs test campaigns, and reads the results.

4
Iterate

With your input at the approval gates — never a live send without a go.

Every generated video ships with an "Audit Steve's Actions" decision log — the real parameters he chose, and why.

FAQ — contract-grade answers

Ask us the hard ones

The questions procurement will ask, answered the way we'd answer them in the room.

Who owns the code Steve writes?

You do. All of it, from day one.

Who owns the rules Steve learns from our incidents?

You own your project-tier corpus; it exports with you. The core doctrine corpus is licensed, non-exclusive, and is never resold with your data in it.

What's the Anthropic relationship?

Independent company, built on Claude. Calls run on your Anthropic account, under your DPA, with your keys — metered through the pod's gateway with hard budget caps.

What data leaves our boundary?

Nothing except calls to your Anthropic account. The pod runs in your VPC or a dedicated instance; there is no phone-home.

What happens if Steve is wrong?

Production actions always escalate to a human approval gate. Defects only close through a proof path: a passing test plus evidence, enforced at the database layer — a claim can't close a bug.

What if you disappear? (continuity)

The pod is reproducible infrastructure: versioned corpus, scripted provisioning, daily regression proof. The singular STEVE-1 is the accountability model; the pod is the continuity model.

What does it cost to run?

Your Anthropic token spend, on your keys, visible per-call in the cockpit with hard caps you set. No hidden metering on our side.

Is there an SSO tax?

No. SSO (OIDC/SAML) ships with every multi-seat deployment; enterprise tiers add audits and compliance work, not login security.

What do we keep if we leave?

Your code, your project-tier rules, your boards' full history, and the audit log. We keep the core doctrine.

Why are there no customer logos?

Because you'd be first, and we priced that honestly: the Design Partner door exists precisely because we're pre-customer-one. The receipts on this page are the reference.

prov: these answers are the contract defaults, not marketing — bring your redlines to the call.

prov: book time with steve

Put 30 minutes on the calendar

This calendar is self-built — no Calendly, no third-party scheduler. It's also a live demo of what Steve ships for you.

The deep-dive materials — the audit companion and the offer sheet — are shared openly on the call. No NDA to see how it works.

Pick a day above to see open times (ET).

No time selected yet.